On the Market: 92 Jane Street, Totally Transparent


Monday, March 19, 2007, by Joshua

2007_03_92jane.jpg

What/Where: Townhouse, Jane btwn Greenwich/Washington
Asking: $16.5 million
Sqft: 5000
Skinny: 24ft-wide, landmarked, award-winning West Village townhouse with a secret behind the plain Jane facade. We'll let the listing do the rest of the talking: "The building's interior organization is driven by its unique south facing rear yard which is enclosed by blind 35 foot high walls, creating a condition of total privacy. This allows the rear façade to be completely transparent. It also makes a private outdoor room that serves as an extension of the living and dining spaces; entry to it is across a marble slab that bridges a reflecting pond." Whoa.

2007_03_92jane_fp.jpg

· Listing: 92 Jane Street [Elliman]


Comments feed for this post Feed icon


Comments (48 extant)

1.

Now that is an Urban Ass House!

By Anonymous at March 19, 2007 4:06 PM

2.

Anybody know who the architect was?

By cl;iik at March 19, 2007 4:10 PM

3.

drool.

By ldlw at March 19, 2007 4:11 PM

4.

The garden walls are not quite blind. Missing an eye, maybe. Look at the listing photos; somebody has a nice view of the bedroom and garden...

By one-eyed willie at March 19, 2007 4:12 PM

5.

Architect is STeven Harris - address is 92 Jane.

Unbelievably elegant and stunning....

By mj at March 19, 2007 4:14 PM

6.

And someone please tell me that the orange Marilyn in listing pictures is not real. If it is, that's worth $20MM - $40MM alone.

By mj at March 19, 2007 4:17 PM

7.

Aside from Marilyn in the Dining Room ( barf ) it's exquisite. No offense to Marilyn. I don't even care if it's a Warhol, it's just weird. "Can I get you some more wine?- now let's see, where is that bottle... Oh, there it is, right next to Marilyn!" Ugh.

By Anonymous at March 19, 2007 4:21 PM

8.

My mother had those chairs in our kitchen- hellooooooooo!

By #7 at March 19, 2007 4:22 PM

9.

They could have at least went with Baker or something a bit more human. I swear that one room looks like the Mausoleum at Pinelawn Cemetery.

By Anonymous at March 19, 2007 4:24 PM

10.

If mausoleum's at Pinelawn Cemetery look as hot as this place, im looking for real estate at pinelawn cemetery

By Anonymous at March 19, 2007 4:32 PM

11.

this is now my dream home - this is possibly the most amazing townhouse i have ever seen in manhattan. Sure its doesn't have the curb appeal of the townhouses in upper east like the one Madonna is buying, but this is just SICK!!! Bravo to the architect and the owner who commissioned it. Now if only i can raise an extra 14.5 Million to buy it.

By Anonymous at March 19, 2007 4:33 PM

12.

Can i get the 450k version please? That would be awesome thanks!!!


By Anonymous at March 19, 2007 4:36 PM

13.

steven harris is a great architect - i would love to have a spare $16.4M right now... not to mention a nice cocktail and a lawn chaise.

By anon at March 19, 2007 4:40 PM

14.

Overpriced to the MAX!

By DaDude at March 19, 2007 4:47 PM

15.

ehhe, #10! I really didn't mean that as put-down... it's really superb... just a bit uhmm, cold.

By Anonymous at March 19, 2007 4:52 PM

16.

Nice, but I doubt I'd want to live there. The whole back wall is glass? What happens when you want some nice darkness? And couldn't they have spruced up the facade a bit while renovating? It doesn't need much, just a power-washer.

By nicemarmot at March 19, 2007 5:04 PM

17.

#16 have you ever heard of blinds. I am also thinking that this 16.5 mill place may include in the budget some of those james bond style hit a button and the windows go tinted thing. But just a hunch, if they dont include that I am sure they could figure out how to add something like that for another mill. My bet is that if you can afford 16.5 you are not maxing out your mortgaging abilities with an interest only loan or 1 year ARM.


By Anonymous at March 19, 2007 5:33 PM

18.

those little Marilyns are much more affordable, in the low seven figure range these days. See if it conveys.

I gotta go with the "it's awesome" crowd precisely because they didn't over-restore the facade. Still, I'm waiting to hear the same setup's available in Youngstown for 1.65mm

By greg.org at March 19, 2007 6:13 PM

19.

Though I like the townhouse, I believe the entire building next door is for sale along with fairly substantial air rights amounting to something like 60,0000 square feet of space. That yard may not be private much longer....

By Anonymous at March 19, 2007 7:16 PM

20.

someone certainly poured some panty removal sauce on that place!

By dont believe da hypeness at March 19, 2007 8:31 PM

21.

#19, you are correct, although the buildable envelope on that next-door site allows for substantially less than 60,000 sf (FAR notwithstanding), which may have something to do with why it is still on the market.

By Anonymous at March 19, 2007 9:07 PM

22.

The house is exquisite, but not as great a design as it should be....the parlor floor is weirdly divided into small rooms....not very usable for this price-point....also no elevator, narrow stairs. The garden while beautifully done is a walled in cube....
Perfect for $ 12,5m. $ 16m? Doubtful.

By realist at March 19, 2007 9:28 PM

23.

#22: The architect blew it by leaving the outside front stairs. Had he removed the stairs and put the entrance at street level, the parlor level would have had a lot more room. It could have been spread out instead of being so chopped up. Regardless of the awards for architecture this place has received, it is really not a great design. $8.5 million TOPS after perhaps being on the market for a long, long time.

By Travis Bickle at March 19, 2007 9:50 PM

24.

i had steven as a studio prof at yale. he's great. if you want a lux house, no cost spared, he's your man.

also, he has one of those marilyn paintings hanging in his tribeca office. hmmm, i see a trend.

By ysoa at March 19, 2007 10:12 PM

25.

The house has been on the the market for one week and rumor has it there has already been an offer in the teens. As for chopping off the front steps, I would like to take this opportunity to introduce mr travis to ms. landmarks....it is about the hottest house i have seen. is the owner single? An unrenovated house down the street just sold for 8.5 so it seems to be priced right. Compared to the 4 seasons on steriods houses uptown for twice the price, its a bargin. And, when MY ship comes in , whats 16.5 anyway...

By brokerwestvillage at March 19, 2007 10:25 PM

26.

#19 the house next door is built full meaning no more expansion. The diane von furstenburg house is two blocks away.

By anom at March 19, 2007 10:29 PM

27.

holy moly what a house...Such a surprize. I've strolled down Jane countless times and never knew it was there.

By drooler at March 19, 2007 10:37 PM

28.

It's an amazing place. But for 16,000,000 I would like a garage and an elevator. Call my picky.

By picky at March 19, 2007 10:39 PM

29.

#23, you are all wrong, the architect blew it by not adding a direct transporter/teleportation device that would get super hot dime pieces from G-Spa in the meatpacking district to 92 Jane faster. This place is pretty pink panty dropper. Well until it get's outdone by the tower o' penthouses on south street.

By Private Equity at March 19, 2007 11:42 PM

30.

The seller is so actor, that's why Mr. DeNIRO got the listing - wake the fuck up asssholes!

By A downtown Broker at March 20, 2007 7:18 AM

31.

what do you mean by "so actor"? is that like a new expression?

By Anonymous at March 20, 2007 10:26 AM

32.

the seller is so developer, actually. He bought the place to reno in 02/05 for $3mm.

By greg.org at March 20, 2007 11:10 AM

33.

umm, I think I've seen this already by John Pawson.

By Anonymous at March 20, 2007 12:52 PM

34.

Hmm... a quick glance at the monthly costs calculator reveals that I would only have to give up 993 of my 1000 Carmel Macchiatos per day to afford this place. It CAN be done.

And as someone mentioned earlier, that garden doesn't appear to be fully 'blind'. Do the owners never get naked?

By Anonymous at March 20, 2007 12:53 PM

35.

Ah, yes, about that Marilyn in the Dining Room...

LONDON (Reuters) - A U.S. collector who bought an Andy Warhol portrait of Marilyn Monroe in 1962 for $250 is offering the painting for sale in May and can expect to fetch over $15 million...

http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=entertainmentNews&storyid=2007-03-19T235210Z_01_L19453888_RTRUKOC_0_US-ARTS-WARHOL.xml

By jazzage at March 20, 2007 1:21 PM

36.

Why is privacy in the garden an issue? It's the rare house in Manhattan that can truly offer privacy. Most buyers won't be expecting to find total privacy. You want privacy? Buy in the tallest building, or buy a house in Upsate New York.

This house is HOT.

By Sanford at March 20, 2007 1:51 PM

37.

Lemme get this right: A developer buys a dump for $3 mil; puts a a simpleton reno on it; slaps on a pricetag with a gain of $13 mil on it; and a bunch of curbed blog posters think it is a great deal. What a country!

By Get Real People! at March 20, 2007 2:49 PM

38.

#37 that reno porbobly cost a few million. and please tell me where you can find a townhouse in the west village for $3 million. The place may not be as nice as your studio in Rego Park, but it is defnitly worth $13 million.

By Anonymous at March 20, 2007 3:35 PM

39.

#37 that reno porbobly cost a few million. and please tell me where you can find a townhouse in the west village for $3 million. The place may not be as nice as your studio in Rego Park, but it is defnitly worth $13 million.

By Anonymous at March 20, 2007 3:35 PM

40.

OK, about that Marilyn. I was right and wrong before.

An Orange Marilyn did sell last Nov. for $16mm [It had sold for $3.7 in 2001, so Warhol's actually been performing better than this WVill real estate.]

BUT it was one of the smaller ones, only 16x20 inches.

There are tons of Marilyns on paper, but this is obviously on canvas. And larger than 16x20. The only problem, though: THE Orange Marilyn, 1964, 40x40, was bought by S.I. Newhouse for $17mm in 1998. It was a transaction that, in retrospect, gets credited with launching the current art market boom. U

So unless S.I.'s in the habit of loaning out his modern Mona Lisa to his young developer friends' spec house stagings, I'm gonna guess that this one is a reproduction. Which strikes me as kinda lame.

By greg.org at March 20, 2007 6:02 PM

41.

How exactly do you cut the grass in this place? I don't see anyone dragging a Lawn Boy though the living room.

By Anonymous at March 20, 2007 8:39 PM

42.

This is like the mullet of houses: business up fromt, party in the back.

By Anonymous at March 20, 2007 10:32 PM

43.

Facinating to see such vitrol on the site. Sounds like disguised envy-or too much caffine. And do we really have to spend all our time discussing the orange painting, maybe thats a different web site. Degrades this important site

By designgirl at March 21, 2007 8:43 AM

44.

sorry, got sidetracked for a minute there. Please help us return to the all-important discussion of the use of fake flowers in the staging of 2BR FSBO's in Murray Hill.

By greg.org at March 21, 2007 4:56 PM

45.

You would have to pay me to live in a four story racketball court.

By Smarter at March 21, 2007 6:08 PM

46.

forget that. has anyone seen what u can get these days up in harlem? no? have a seat and take a browse at the most incredible townhouse on Strivers Row. IF you think you've seen it all for that area.. think again.. this house will blow your mind. www.harlemluxury.com

By transparently OTT at March 23, 2007 4:29 PM

47.

I think it is ridiculous and awesome. I also think some of the people posting here should consider cutting back to a single-shot latte. Wow.

By Anonymous at March 26, 2007 4:25 PM

48.

Not so private if you are on the roof of the Industria building, which is where I saw this place last summer while it was under construction. But still very cool.

By Rick at April 13, 2007 3:09 PM




Back to top


photos in Curbed Photo Pool See more and submit to Curbed Photo Pool

Links
New York City
Gawker
Gothamist
Morning News
The Politicker
DailyCandy
Manhattan User's Guide

Real Estate Listings
Curbed's mega-linklist of NYC real estate brokers and listings search sites

Real Estate Blogs & Media
Brownstoner
Matrix
Property Grunt
The Real Estate
The Real Deal
Inman News
Triple Mint
HotelChatter
The Boxtank
The Cooperator
Habitat Magazine
Slatin Report
NYTimes Real Estate
NYPost Real Estate

Real Estate Resources
ACRIS
Trulia
Property Shark
Zillow
RadCribs
RealtyBaron
PostYourProperty
Street Easy

Architecture & Urbanity
The Gutter
Archinect
Tropolism
Wired New York
eOculus
Architects Newspaper
Arch Week
Arch Record
Regional Plan Assoc
Planetizen
Veritas & Venustas
City Comforts
Daily Dose
BLDGBLOG

Design & Shelter
Metropolis
Apartment Therapy
Unbeige
MoCo Loco
Reluct
Cool Hunting
Treehugger
WorldChanging
Sensory Impact
Funfurde
DesignSponge
GNR8
Land & Living
Hamptons C&G

Community Media
Village Voice
NYPress
Gotham Gazette
The Villager
Downtown Express
Resident
Hell's Kitchen Online
Tribeca Trib
East-Village.com
Volume NYC
L Magazine
Block Magazine
Brooklyn Papers

Big Media
NYTimes
NYPost
NYDailyNews
New York Mag
NYObserver
Newsday
Crain's


About Curbed
In New York City, it comes back to real estate, rent and the neighborhoods we inhabit. More about Curbed...

Archives & Feeds


Full content feed

Search this site



Credits
CURBED NY


Senior Editor
Joey Arak

Brooklyn Editor
Robert Guskind

Contributing Editor
Pete Davies

Roving Photographer
Will Femia

Logo
Khoi Uong


CURBED NETWORK
Editorial Director
Ben Leventhal

Sales
Joshua Albertson

Head of Technology
Eliot Shepard

Publisher/GM
Kyle Crafton

President
Lockhart Steele

Other Curbed Sites
New York
Eater NY
Racked
The Beach (seasonal)

San Francisco
Curbed SF
Eater SF

Los Angeles
Curbed LA
Eater LA


Contact Us
Email Curbed

Copyright © 2008 Curbed